The Art of Flexibility: Thriving in Chaotic Environments

 

The Art of Flexibility: Thriving in Chaotic Environments

Why adaptability, not control, is the key to navigating uncertainty

The Barbell Principle

The barbell principle suggests that the best strategy for handling uncertainty is to be extremely conservative in some areas while taking calculated risks in others whilst avoiding the fragile middle ground where moderate approaches often fail under pressure. This creates antifragile systems that don't just survive chaos but actually gain strength from it, much like a weightlifter who combines maximum safety protocols with progressive overload to build resilience.

Understanding the Nature of Stress

Stress has become synonymous with suffering in modern discourse, but this perspective misses a fundamental truth. Stress is not inherently destructive, it's an adaptive mechanism that has helped humans survive and evolve for millennia. Like a barbell in the gymnasium, stress provides the necessary resistance that builds strength, but only when approached with proper form and recovery.

The challenge lies not in eliminating stress, but in learning how to respond to it effectively. Consider the barbell principle: extreme safety in some areas (proper form, adequate rest) combined with calculated risk-taking in others (progressive overload, challenging weights). This same approach applies to navigating chaos.

When we encounter stressful situations, our systems are essentially being tested. Each moment of pressure asks: How adaptable are we? How creative can we become under constraint? What truly matters when resources are limited? The quality of our response determines whether we grow stronger or become overwhelmed, much like the difference between productive training stress and injury-causing overload.

The Rigidity Trap

Many people approach stress with rigid thinking patterns that inadvertently amplify the problem. This creates what we might call a "fragile middle", systems that appear stable in normal conditions but catastrophically fail under pressure. True antifragility requires a different approach: being extremely conservative in some areas while embracing controlled volatility in others.

This rigidity manifests in several ways:

Fixed methodologies: Insisting on doing things only one way, regardless of changing circumstances. The barbell approach suggests having one rock-solid primary method while maintaining several experimental alternatives.

Inflexible expectations: Maintaining unrealistic standards that don't account for external variables. Instead, establish non-negotiable core standards while allowing wide variation in secondary elements.

Binary thinking: Viewing situations as either complete success or total failure, with no middle ground. The barbell mindset recognizes that most outcomes should be "good enough" while reserving perfectionism for truly critical elements.

Control illusions: Believing we can and should control outcomes rather than focusing on our responses. Apply maximum control to your preparation and response systems, while accepting zero control over external events.

This rigid approach creates a brittle system that shatters under pressure, much like a tree that refuses to bend in strong winds. The barbell alternative: be extremely robust in your core principles while remaining maximally flexible in your methods.

Rules vs. Principles: A Framework for Flexibility

The distinction between rules and principles provides a powerful framework for navigating chaos, perfectly embodying the barbell approach. Rules are specific, inflexible directives that work well in stable environments but become liabilities when conditions change. Principles are underlying values that can be expressed through multiple approaches. They represent the "heavy ends" of the barbell where you remain absolutely committed, while the methods (the "light middle") remain fluid and adaptable.

Consider these examples of barbell thinking:

Fragile rule-based approach: "I must exercise for exactly one hour at 6 AM every day." Antifragile principle-based approach: "I am absolutely committed to maintaining peak physical condition (heavy end), while remaining completely flexible about when, where, and how I achieve this (light end)."

Fragile rule-based approach: "All project meetings must follow the predetermined agenda." Antifragile principle-based approach: "We are fanatical about advancing project goals efficiently (heavy end), while being maximally adaptive about meeting formats and structures (light end)."

Fragile rule-based approach: "Emails must be answered within two hours." Antifragile principle-based approach: "I am uncompromising about professional communication standards (heavy end), while maintaining complete flexibility in response timing and methods based on context (light end)."

The principle-based approach maintains the core intention with religious devotion while allowing for maximum adaptation in execution methods.

Practical Strategies for Chaotic Environments

1. The Outcome-First Method

When disruption occurs, immediately identify the essential outcome you're trying to achieve. Then work backward to find the most efficient path to that outcome, regardless of your original plan. This approach separates what you're trying to accomplish from how you initially planned to accomplish it.

2. Capacity Management

Design your systems using barbell capacity allocation: operate core functions at maximum robustness while maintaining significant buffer space for adaptation. Rather than the fragile middle-ground of running everything at 85% capacity, dedicate 90-95% of your resources to essential, non-negotiable activities while reserving 5-10% as completely flexible adaptation space.

This built-in buffer creates antifragile capacity, not just the ability to withstand unexpected demands, but to potentially benefit from them. Whether applied to schedules, budgets, or energy management, this principle creates space for opportunistic adaptation while protecting critical functions.

3. Stress as Information

Reframe stress as a data source rather than a problem to be eliminated. High stress often indicates misalignment between expectations and reality, insufficient resources, or the need for strategic changes. By treating stress as information, you can respond more strategically.

4. The Adaptation Question

In any challenging situation, ask: "How can I bend here without breaking?" This question shifts focus from rigid resistance to creative problem-solving. It acknowledges constraints while seeking workable solutions.

5. Rapid Prototyping Mindset

Approach uncertain situations with barbell experimentation: maintain your core operations with maximum stability while running small, high-frequency experiments on the periphery. This creates an antifragile learning system where small failures provide valuable information without threatening core functions, while occasional breakthrough discoveries can be rapidly scaled.

Try small, low-risk adjustments with high learning potential and observe the results. This allows for quick course corrections and opportunistic gains without committing to potentially problematic long-term changes. The key is asymmetric risk: limited downside with unlimited upside potential.

The Paradox of Control

One of the most counterintuitive aspects of thriving in chaos is that attempting to control everything often leads to controlling nothing effectively. This represents a fundamental misunderstanding of where to apply the barbell principle. True antifragile influence comes from applying maximum control to your preparation, principles, and response systems while exercising zero control over external events and outcomes.

This creates an asymmetric advantage: you become extremely robust in areas where control is possible and beneficial, while remaining completely adaptive to areas where control is impossible. Like a skilled sailor who cannot control the wind but maintains fanatical attention to sail condition, navigation skills, and weather monitoring systems, effective chaos navigation requires sharp discrimination between leverage points and external variables.

This doesn't mean passive acceptance of poor circumstances. Rather, it means concentrating all your control efforts on high-impact, controllable elements while developing antifragile responses to everything else. The barbell approach suggests being maximally prepared for worst-case scenarios while remaining positioned to capture unlimited upside from positive surprises.

Building Adaptive Capacity

Flexibility is not just a reactive skill, it's a capacity that can be developed proactively using barbell principles. The goal is creating antifragile systems that don't just survive chaos but potentially thrive from it. Consider these approaches:

Cross-training: Develop one world-class primary method alongside multiple backup approaches. Master your core competency to an extreme degree while maintaining basic proficiency in several alternatives. This creates asymmetric preparedness with minimal downside and significant upside potential.

Scenario planning: Invest heavily in preparing for tail-risk scenarios (the extreme ends) while maintaining general adaptability for common variations (the middle). Regularly consider "what if" situations and over-prepare for low-probability, high-impact events while maintaining flexible responses for everyday disruptions.

Feedback loops: Create ultra-sensitive early warning systems that provide maximum information with minimal delay. Invest heavily in detection capabilities while maintaining hair-trigger responsiveness to signals. Quick detection enables faster adaptation and potentially turns problems into opportunities.

Recovery protocols: Develop bulletproof systems for returning to peak effectiveness after any disruption. Like athletes who over-train recovery methods to handle extreme situations, build redundant bounce-back capabilities. This creates antifragile resilience where disruptions potentially strengthen rather than weaken your overall system.

The Strength of Yielding

Strategic yielding: consciously choosing when to give way rather than resist. These often requires more strength than rigid opposition. This concept appears across disciplines from martial arts to engineering to negotiation.

Yielding doesn't mean surrendering your objectives. It means finding ways to achieve your goals that work with current conditions rather than against them. A bridge that sways in strong winds often outlasts one that tries to remain completely rigid.

Implementation Framework

To develop greater flexibility in chaotic environments:

Assess current rigidities: Identify areas where you maintain unnecessarily rigid approaches. Look for rules that could be converted to principles.

Experiment with small changes: Choose low-risk situations to practice adaptive thinking. Build comfort with deviation from standard approaches.

Develop multiple pathways: For important goals, cultivate several different methods of achievement. This redundancy creates options when primary approaches fail.

Practice stress reframing: When stress arises, consciously ask what information it's providing rather than immediately trying to eliminate it.

Build buffer capacity: Create margins in time, energy, and resources that can absorb unexpected demands.

Conclusion

Chaos and stress are permanent features of complex environments, but they also represent the raw material for antifragile growth. Fighting their existence wastes energy that could be directed toward building asymmetric advantage from their presence. The most successful individuals and organizations don't avoid chaos, they develop superior abilities to benefit from it through barbell strategies.

This navigation requires strategic flexibility: the capacity to be immovably committed to core principles while remaining maximally adaptive in methods. Like water that maintains its essential molecular structure while taking any shape necessary to flow around obstacles, we can learn to hold our fundamental purposes with absolute dedication while remaining completely fluid in our approaches.

The goal isn't to eliminate uncertainty, that's impossible and would eliminate opportunity along with risk. Instead, the objective is developing antifragile capacity: systems that become stronger under stress, more capable under pressure, and more opportunity-rich in chaos.

In a world of constant change, the barbell approach isn't just an advantage, it's the difference between fragile systems that break under pressure and antifragile systems that transform chaos into strength. Master your core, stay flexible in your methods, and position yourself to gain more from volatility than you can lose from it.

Why Workplace "Family" Culture Fails

 

Beyond the Family Facade: Building Authentic Professional Relationships

"We're like a family here" ranks among the most destructive phrases in modern workplaces. This seemingly warm sentiment fundamentally misunderstands healthy professional relationships and creates environments built on manipulation rather than mutual respect.

The Seductive Appeal and Fundamental Contradictions

The workplace-as-family narrative appeals to deep human needs for belonging, particularly in an atomized society where traditional community structures have weakened. Organizations exploit this vulnerability, using family rhetoric to secure emotional investment that exceeds professional considerations.

However, this creates inherent contradictions. Families ideally provide unconditional security and acceptance regardless of performance. Employment is fundamentally conditional for it is usually based on performance and business needs. When organizations invoke family language while maintaining termination rights, they create cognitive dissonance that breeds cynicism. The "family member" laid off during restructuring experiences this contradiction viscerally.

The Problem of Boundaries

Family rhetoric actively undermines boundaries essential to professional relationships. In families, boundaries are fluid, with emotional labor and personal sacrifice forming connection fabric. When transplanted professionally, these dynamics create environments where personal boundaries blur or disappear.

Employees feel pressured to share personal information, work excessive hours out of "family loyalty," or tolerate inappropriate behavior. The expectation of familial devotion enables exploitation, where business requests become emotional manipulations: "Would you let your family down?"

This boundary erosion particularly harms women socialized to provide emotional labor, younger workers uncertain about workplace norms, and individuals from cultures with strong family obligation traditions.

The Retirement Trap

For employees approaching retirement, workplace family culture becomes especially insidious. Organizations leverage decades of "family loyalty" to pressure older workers into extended careers, delayed retirement, or unfavorable consulting arrangements. The narrative becomes: "You can't abandon your work family when they need you most."

Skilled professionals sacrifice retirement planning because leaving feels like "betraying the family." Others accept reduced pension benefits to "help the organization through tough times." The family metaphor weaponizes loyalty earned through years of service, transforming natural career transitions into guilt-inducing abandonment scenarios.

Companies expect retiring employees to provide extensive unpaid training or emotional labor framed as "family responsibility." The asymmetry is stark: organizations maintain economic flexibility while employees face emotional obligations extending beyond professional requirements.

Economic Relationships Disguised as Emotional Ones

The family narrative obscures employment's fundamental economic nature, making it harder for employees to advocate for fair compensation or reasonable conditions. After all, families don't negotiate, instead, they sacrifice for common good.

This dynamic is asymmetrical. Employees think in familial terms while organizations maintain clear economic priorities. Family rhetoric creates emotional obligations for employees while preserving economic flexibility for employers.

Toward Authentic Professional Values

Rather than hiding behind family metaphors, organizations should embrace values acknowledging workplace relationships' professional nature:

Mutual Respect forms the foundation and its earned through competence, integrity, and considerate behavior rather than emotional intimacy or personal sacrifice.

Clear Communication becomes possible when relationships aren't burdened by familial expectations of intuitive understanding. Professional environments benefit from explicit expectations and transparent feedback.

Professional Growth acknowledges career development's developmental nature. Unlike families with fixed roles, professional relationships should support individual advancement to an extend of sometimes meaning supporting transitions elsewhere.

Appropriate Boundaries protect wellbeing and enable sustainable relationships. Professional environments should support privacy rights, work-life balance, and emotional autonomy.

Reciprocal Benefit honestly acknowledges that professional relationships exist because they serve mutual interests. This realistic foundation proves more sustainable than pseudo-familial obligations.

Building Collaborative Excellence

The most effective environments aren't built on family metaphors but collaborative excellence through shared pursuit of meaningful goals benefiting individuals and organizations. This approach creates genuine connection through shared purpose and mutual achievement while encouraging healthy competition, diverse perspectives, and individual accountability.

The Path Forward

Organizations should abandon family rhetoric for authentic values. This means being honest about employment's conditional nature while creating fair, transparent conditions. Leaders can model these values by communicating clearly about business realities, respecting boundaries, providing honest feedback, and acknowledging employment's economic nature.

For employees, embracing professional relationships means setting appropriate boundaries, focusing on development and contribution, and building relationships based on mutual respect rather than emotional intimacy.

For those approaching retirement: Resist guilt-based pressure to extend careers or accept unfavorable arrangements. Plan transitions based on personal needs, not organizational emotional appeals. Remember that retirement is a professional milestone, not family abandonment.

Conclusion

The workplace-as-family metaphor creates confusion, exploitation, and unsustainable emotional demands. Authentic professional relationships are majorly built on mutual respect, clear communication, appropriate boundaries, and honest reciprocal benefit and offer sustainable alternatives that honor both employment's economic reality and human needs for connection.

Future workplace success lies in creating professional environments so excellent and respectful that genuine connection emerges naturally from shared accomplishment, without emotional manipulation or boundary violations that family rhetoric inevitably creates.

 

Birthday Reflections: The Gift of Understanding How We Shape Each Other's Light

Birthday Reflections: The Gift of Understanding How We Shape Each Other's Light

A Personal Note of Gratitude

"And yet to times in hope my verse shall stand, / Praising thy worth, despite his cruel hand."

Yesterday marked another year of my life's journey, at the eve of my midlife crisis that stand agape before my like vultures staring at lion engulfing its catch to voraciously devour the caucuses remains. Another wave in Shakespeare's endless procession toward the pebbled shore. As I received countless birthday wishes from friends, family, colleagues, and acquaintances, I found myself deeply moved not just by their kindness, but by a profound realization that each message represented a choice to multiply rather than diminish, to add light rather than create eclipse.

In the quiet moments after the celebrations, I reflected on the lessons that years of leadership, followership, and simple human interaction have taught me. These insights, hard-won through both triumph and failure, feel too precious to keep to myself. So I offer them here, humbly, as my birthday gift to all of you who took time to celebrate another year of my existence. Your wishes reminded me that we are all both students and teachers in the great classroom of human potential.

What I share comes not from a place of having arrived, but from one who continues to learn daily about the profound responsibility we bear in shaping each other's destinies. May these reflections serve as both mirror and lamp, revealing what we are and illuminating what we might become.

When the teacher shows up the student is always ready.

---

Time's Cruel Hand: How Leaders Shape Destinies Through Multiplication or Diminishment

Shakespeare's Sonnet 60

Like as the waves make towards the pebbled shore, So do our minutes hasten to their end; Each changing place with that which goes before, In sequent toil all forwards do contend. Nativity, once in the main of light, Crawls to maturity, wherewith being crowned, Crooked eclipses 'gainst his glory fight, And Time, that gave, doth now his gift confound. Time doth transfix the flourish set on youth, And delves the parallels in beauty's brow, Feeds on the rarities of nature's truth, And nothing stands but for his scythe to mow: And yet to times in hope my verse shall stand, Praising thy worth, despite his cruel hand.

---

Shakespeare's meditation on time's relentless march reveals profound truths about human potential and its destruction. The sonnet's metaphors—waves inevitably reaching shore, light dimming into eclipse, Time's scythe harvesting all beauty—illuminate how external forces can either nurture or destroy the "rarities of nature's truth" within each person. While Shakespeare focuses on temporal destruction, his imagery provides a powerful lens through which to examine leadership's profound impact on human flourishing.

The Metaphorical Foundation

Shakespeare's wave metaphor establishes the relentless nature of influence. Each moment builds upon the previous, creating cumulative effects that cannot be undone. His portrayal of "Nativity, once in the main of light" speaks to the inherent potential within every individual, while "crooked eclipses 'gainst his glory fight" reveals how external forces can systematically obscure and diminish that inner radiance. Most powerfully, Time is presented as both giver and destroyer. The same force that crowns maturity later wields the scythe.

These images provide a framework for understanding leadership's dual nature: leaders, like Time itself, possess the power to elevate individuals to their full potential or systematically diminish their capabilities and confidence.

Diminishers: Wielding Time's Cruel Hand

The Nature of Diminishing Leadership

Diminishers operate like Shakespeare's personified Time, initially appearing to grant opportunities and recognition, only to systematically undermine the very potential they seem to cultivate. These leaders create environments where talent withers, confidence erodes, and human capacity shrinks.

King Saul exemplifies the diminisher's destructive pattern. Initially anointed with divine favor, Saul began as "a choice young man, and a goodly: and there was not among the children of Israel a goodlier person than he" (1 Samuel 9:2). Yet his insecurity and need for control transformed him into a leader who systematically diminished those around him, most notably David.

When David's success in battle earned the praise, "Saul hath slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands" (1 Samuel 18:7), Saul's response revealed the diminisher's mindset: "And Saul was very wroth, and the saying displeased him; and he said, They have ascribed unto David ten thousands, and to me they have ascribed but thousands: and what can he have more but the kingdom?" (1 Samuel 18:8).

Diminisher Characteristics and Their Effects

The Scarcity Mindset: Like Saul, diminishers operate from the belief that others' success threatens their own position. They view talent as a zero-sum resource, leading them to hoard opportunities and suppress emerging leaders.

The Eclipse Creator: Diminishers create "crooked eclipses" against their followers' glory. Pharaoh's treatment of the Israelites demonstrates this pattern: "Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens" (Exodus 1:11). As the Israelites multiplied and prospered, Pharaoh's fear led him to systematically crush their potential through oppression.

The Talent Harvester: Like Time's scythe, diminishers "feed on the rarities of nature's truth." They extract value from their people while giving little in return. The rich man in Jesus's parable of Lazarus exemplifies this, living in abundance while allowing the beggar at his gate to suffer (Luke 16:19-21).

Survival Mechanisms of the Diminished

Under diminishing leadership, individuals develop defensive strategies reminiscent of David's survival tactics:

Strategic Withdrawal: David "behaved himself wisely in all his ways; and the Lord was with him" (1 Samuel 18:14), learning when to advance and when to retreat from Saul's destructive presence.

Underground Networks: The diminished often create covert support systems. David gathered "every one that was in distress, and every one that was in debt, and every one that was discontented" (1 Samuel 22:2), building strength outside the diminisher's direct influence.

Preserved Vision: Despite persecution, those under diminishing leadership often maintain hope for future restoration, much as David continued to honor Saul as "the Lord's anointed" even while fleeing his persecution.

Multipliers: Channels of Divine Increase

The Nature of Multiplying Leadership

Multipliers embody the creative, life-giving aspect of influence. They operate on the principle that human potential is not fixed but expandable, that their role is to amplify rather than diminish the capabilities of those they lead.

Moses demonstrates multiplying leadership when overwhelmed by the burden of judging Israel. Rather than hoarding authority, he followed Jethro's counsel: "Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens" (Exodus 18:21). This multiplication of leadership capacity strengthened the entire nation.

Multiplier Characteristics and Their Effects

The Talent Multiplier: Jesus's parable of the talents illustrates multiplying leadership: "His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things" (Matthew 25:21). Multipliers invest in people's growth and celebrate their expanding capabilities.

The Light Magnifier: Rather than creating eclipses, multipliers amplify existing light. John the Baptist modeled this: "He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light" (John 1:8). He understood his role was to point to and amplify something greater than himself.

The Potential Liberator: Multiplying leaders see and call forth latent abilities. When Jesus called Simon Peter, he saw beyond the impulsive fisherman to declare, "Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church" (Matthew 16:18). He consistently spoke to people's potential rather than their current limitations.

Growth Mechanisms Under Multipliers

Expanding Responsibility: Under multiplying leadership, individuals experience progressive growth in responsibility and capability. The centurion who approached Jesus demonstrated the authority structure that multipliers create: "For I am a man under authority, having soldiers under me: and I say to this man, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh" (Matthew 8:9).

Collective Empowerment: Multipliers create environments where "iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend" (Proverbs 27:17). They foster peer learning and mutual development rather than competition.

Legacy Building: Unlike diminishers who seek to be indispensable, multipliers prepare successors. Paul's relationship with Timothy exemplifies this: "The things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also" (2 Timothy 2:2).

Societal Implications: The Ripple Effect

The Diminisher's Wake

Societies under diminishing leadership experience what might be called "institutional eclipse." When leaders systematically undermine human potential, entire cultures can enter periods of decline. The consequences of Pharaoh's diminishing leadership extended beyond the Israelites to bring judgment upon all Egypt through the plagues.

The Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar's pride led him to diminish others and claim divine prerogatives: "Is not this great Babylon, that I have built for the house of the kingdom by the might of my power, and for the honour of my majesty?" (Daniel 4:30). His subsequent madness and restoration serve as a metaphor for how diminishing leadership ultimately destroys both leader and society.

The Multiplier's Legacy

Conversely, multiplying leadership creates expanding circles of influence that outlast the original leader. Solomon's wisdom multiplied throughout the known world: "And all the earth sought to Solomon, to hear his wisdom, which God had put in his heart" (1 Kings 10:24). The effects of multiplying leadership compound across generations.

The early church under multiplying apostolic leadership demonstrates this principle: "And the word of God increased; and the number of the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly" (Acts 6:7). Each multiplying leader created more multiplying leaders, resulting in exponential growth.

Breaking the Diminisher Cycle

Recognition and Response

The first step in countering diminishing leadership involves recognition. Like the Israelites who "sighed by reason of the bondage, and they cried, and their cry came up unto God" (Exodus 2:23), those under diminishing leadership must acknowledge their situation and seek change.

Strategic Resistance

Sometimes resistance to diminishing leadership requires courage and strategic action. When Haman sought to destroy all Jews, Esther risked her life to expose his diminishing agenda: "If I perish, I perish" (Esther 4:16). Her willingness to challenge diminishing authority saved an entire people.

Creating Multiplying Environments

Even within diminishing systems, individuals can create pockets of multiplication. Daniel maintained his multiplying influence even within Babylon's diminishing regime, consistently pointing others toward divine wisdom and demonstrating integrity that elevated those around him.

Conclusion: The Choice of Legacy

Shakespeare's sonnet concludes with hope: "And yet to times in hope my verse shall stand, / Praising thy worth, despite his cruel hand." This final couplet reveals the power of multiplication over diminishment. While Time's cruel hand destroys physical beauty, that is, the act of recognizing and celebrating worth, creates something lasting.

Leadership operates by the same principle. Diminishers, like Time's scythe, may achieve temporary dominance by harvesting human potential for their own benefit. But multipliers, like Shakespeare's verse, create legacies that outlast their physical presence by investing in the "rarities of nature's truth" within each person they influence.

The biblical record consistently shows that multiplying leaders leave lasting positive impacts while diminishing leaders create cycles of destruction that eventually consume them. As Proverbs wisely observes: "The memory of the just is blessed: but the name of the wicked shall rot" (Proverbs 10:7).

In our roles as leaders, whether in families, communities, or organizations…we face Shakespeare's fundamental choice: will we wield Time's cruel hand, systematically diminishing the potential around us, or will we create verses of hope that multiply human flourishing across generations? The answer determines not only our legacy but the trajectory of all those whose "minutes hasten to their end" under our influence.

The waves will continue their relentless march toward the shore, and our minutes will hasten to their appointed end. But the choice of how we shape the human potential entrusted to our care…whether we multiply or diminish it, echoes in eternity, "praising thy worth, despite his cruel hand."